Minnesota: BAR complaint filed against public defender details how group of lawyers covered up sex crimes against children

By Timothy Charles Holmseth on August 24, 2018 at 5:41 P.M. CST

The most basic legal observation by Steven Biss, a trial attorney from the Washington D.C. area, regarding an injunction placed against a Minnesota journalist, Timothy Charles Holmseth, by a judge in Broward County, Florida, has resulted in an explosion of revelations that leads to the systemic cover up of sex crimes against children by court officers in the Minnesota judicial system.

In 2011, Judge Michael Kaplan, Broward County, Florida issued an order against Holmseth that read: THE RESPONDENT SHALL NOT MAKE ANY DIRECT OR INDIRECT REFERENCE ABOUT THE PETITIONER ON THE INTERNET OR BY USE OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION. THE RESPONDENT SHALL REMOVE ALL BOOKS, WRITINGS, VIDEOS, PHOTOS, RECORDINGS, AND/OR MATERIALS CURRENTLY PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET ABOUT THE PETITIONER FORTWITH.

Holmseth had never personally met the Petitioner nor had he been to Florida.

Holmseth is a former award winning news reporter who became an FBI witness in 2009 after he happened upon a group of child traffickers and pornographers that kidnapped a child from Florida named HaLeigh Cummings.

Attorney Biss looked at the domestic violence protection order placed against Holmseth, who Biss represents in a federal lawsuit, and almost immediately recognized the order violated Holmseth's First Amendment protections under the Constitution. "Tim, its unconstitutional. It's so broad it would prohibit you from talking to me," Biss said.

Yet…

In the past seven years, Holmseth has been arrested and jailed twice, and assigned a total of three different lawyers by the Minnesota Public Defenders Office.

Those lawyers are Michael LaCoursiere, Bruce Ringstrom, and Gretchen Handy.

Every attorney assigned to Holmseth steadfastly refused to challenge the Florida order based upon the argument it violates the First Amendment.

There's a reason.

Holmseth uncovered a transnational child sex trafficking operation that has been receiving cover and protection from the City of East Grand Forks through operative police officers and the city attorney, Ronald Galstad.

At the most recent hearing regarding his criminal charges, Holmseth advised the Polk County Court that he is filing a federal deprivation of rights lawsuit.

Yesterday, Holmseth requested a copy of his file from Attorney Gretchen Handy. Handy said she would give Holmseth the Discovery, but not anything else, because it is attorney work product and he is not entitled to it.

After consulting with Attorney Biss, the Minnesota BAR, and the Office of Lawyer Professional Responsibility, Holmseth filed a formal complaint against Handy, today.

The next court hearing is scheduled for August 31, 2018 at 1:00 P.M.

The formal complaint is below.

You can click here to view an easy understand and detailed synopsis with exhibits that shows how the East Grand Forks Police Department and a private shadow government corporation from Indiana attempted to frame Timothy Charles Holmseth for kidnapping, rape, and murder in a ‘Steven Avery – Making a Murderer’ style frame up that narrowly failed.  

* * * * *

From: Timothy Charles Holmseth [mailto:tholmseth@wiktel.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 10:50 AM
To: 'Fontaine, Kip O.'
Cc: 'Handy, Gretchen'; 'kristine.kolar@pubdef.state.mn.us'
Subject: In Re: State of Minnesota v. Timothy Charles Holmseth 
Timothy Charles Holmseth
320 17th Street N.W.
Unit # 17
East Grand Forks, MN
56721
www.writeintoaction.com
tholmseth@wiktel.com
218.773.1299

In Re: State of Minnesota v. Timothy Charles Holmseth

July 30, 2018

Attorney Kip Fontaine
Supervisor
Public Defenders Office
Thief River Falls, MN

Attorney Fontaine,

I am requesting Attorney Gretchen Handy be dismissed as my legal counsel for the following reasons:

  1. Attorney Handy failed to execute "reasonable diligence" and showed no "zeal" whatsoever when she should have been advocating for me pursuant to Rule 1.3 Diligence

[1] A lawyer should pursue a matter on behalf of a client despite opposition, obstruction, or personal inconvenience to the lawyer, and take whatever lawful and ethical measures are required to vindicate a client's cause or endeavor. A lawyer must also act with commitment and dedication to the interests of the client and with zeal in advocacy upon the client's behalf. A lawyer is not bound, however, to press for every advantage that might be realized for a client. For example, a lawyer may have authority to exercise professional discretion in determining the means by which a matter should be pursued. See Rule 1.2. The lawyer's duty to act with reasonable diligence does not require the use of offensive tactics or preclude the treating of all persons involved in the legal process with courtesy and respect.

Attorney Handy and her investigator met with Attorney Handy's client Timothy Holmseth at the law offices of Handy Law Group. They discussed the court order issued in Broward County, Florida used to arrest and charge Timothy Holmseth. Timothy Holmseth came to the meeting well prepared with documents, exhibits, and evidence. Timothy Holmseth argued the Constitutionality and Jurisdiction of the Florida Order. Attorney Handy said,  "This is the Order and unfortunately were stuck with it".

At that same meeting they further discussed the court order issued in Broward County, Florida used to arrest and charge Timothy Holmseth. Timothy Holmseth argued to Attorney Handy that many federal laws were/are being violated. Attorney Handy said, "I'm not licensed to practice federal law". 

Timothy Holmseth advised Attorney Handy of evidence of sex crimes against children and human trafficking that is contained within the Polk County, Minnesota District Court files that constitute the 'evidence' held by the East Grand Forks Police Department in State of Minnesota v. Timothy Charles Holmseth.

Timothy Holmseth advised Attorney Handy he is being charged for publishing files that actually contain evidence that child pornography of a missing five year old was created and possessed by REDACTED REDACTED, the 'victim' in the case. Timothy Holmseth advised Attorney Handy that REDACTED REDACTED is captured on tape using her law license in conjunction with her connections to law enforcement and Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) to steal a baby from a witness in the HaLeigh Cummings kidnapping case. Timothy Holmseth expressed to Attorney Handy there are rules of professional conduct that requires lawyers "Shall" report Misconduct of another lawyer. Timothy Holmseth expressed to Attorney Handy that both Attorney Ronald Galstad and Attorney REDACTED REDACTED were engaging in Misconduct in a conspiracy to commit abuse of process by charging Timothy Holmseth with a crime to further advance and/or avoid prosecution for crimes against children.

At the meeting at Handy Law Office, after Timothy Holmseth expressed his thoughts and concerns and laid out his desired defenses regarding the court order issued in Broward County, Florida, Attorney Handy spoke. She asked Timothy Holmseth a question. She said, 'What made you think it would be alright to publish that on the Web despite the court order?' Timothy Holmseth replied by re-phrasing Attorney Handy's question back to her and removed the dynamic regarding the identity of the actual person that pushed the 'Send' button to publish the court records. Attorney Handy then re-iterated her question in its initial form where she again said it was Timothy Holmseth that published the court records.

Attorney Handy asked Timothy Holmseth the question about 'why' he did it, as if she was suggesting, that if he provided a good enough reason, explanation, or excuse, it may be a defense. However, Attorney Handy fully knows that would not be true. This appeared to be a deliberate attempt by Attorney Handy, with her investigator present as a witness, to solicit a confession or trick her own client into making what appeared to be a confession.

Following that meeting, Timothy Holmseth began to pressure Attorney Handy regarding her obligations to him as a client. He communicated his thoughts and concerns with Attorney Handy and published some of his communications online for the public to read. Several of his email communications included copies to Attorney Handy's supervisor, Kip Fontaine and Kristine Kolar, chief public defender, State of Minnesota.

 On July 18, 2018 Timothy Holmseth emailed Attorney Handy the following:

* * * * *

Timothy Charles Holmseth
320 17th Street N.W.
Unit # 17
East Grand Forks, MN
56721
www.writeintoaction.com
tholmseth@wiktel.com
218.773.1299

In Re: Polk County Court Hearing on July 19, 2018 at 1:00 P.M.

July 18, 2018

Gretchen Handy
Handy Law Group PLLC
4050 Garden View Drive, Suite 100
Grand Forks, ND 58201

On January 4, 2013 Attorney Ronald Galstad committed perjury when he told Judge Yon that he and the Pine to Prairie Gang and Drug Task Force were communicating with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) to conduct a forensic examination of my computer hard -drive which was seized on December 14, 2012 using a warrant obtained by Sgt. Aeisso Schrage that was signed by Judge Remick. As you know, emails I received from Superintendant Drew Evans and Jill Oliveira at the BCA prove the BCA knew nothing about that huge raid on my home office where police seized all my digital property etc. and placed BCA evidence stickers on it.

Ronald Galstad lied to the Court because he was ACTIVELY and CONSCIOUSLY concealing the fact that the police and task force were looking for child rape pornography of five year-old HaLeigh Ann-Marie Cummings who vanished from her Florida home in 2009. The East Grand Forks Police, Ronald Galstad, and the Task Force had been told by members and associates of an Indiana group called Specialized Investigative Consultants Inc. that I possessed those pictures. They executed a plan to make me look like a drug dealer, as well as claiming they were searching for something pertaining to the Broward County Court Order, so they could convince a judge to sign the warrant. They believed they could simply pretend they 'stumbled upon' the photos of HaLeigh Cummings while leaving no written record of any kind regarding the source of their information which, was in fact, the actual child sex traffickers that kidnapped, sexually assaulted, and photographed the little girl.

Ronald Galstad committed perjury in the process of a conspiracy to frame me for kidnapping, rape, production of child porn, and murder of HaLeigh Cummings.

There is evidence that Ronald Galstad and other members of the police department, including Lt. Rodney Hajicek, conspired against me in an individual capacity that was separate and apart from their official duties.

TOMORROWS COURT HEARING

It sounds like there might be a continuance due to a different judge filling in.

My position is the lawyer that represents me SHALL confront the following:

- Violations of my constitutional rights regarding the fraudulently obtained Broward County Court Order
- Perjury by Attorney Ronald Galstad against me
- Criminal conspiracy to aid and abet bad actors committing kidnapping, trafficking, fake adoptions, and sex crimes against children

I also believe the lawyer that represents me should assist me in making contact with the FBI so I can give the FBI the evidence I obtained as a journalist regarding the child sex trafficking and baby sales operation. The Broward Court Order presently makes it a crime for me to even talk about the Petitioner (and victim in this case) with ANYONE through use of "electronic communications".  

CIVIL LAWSUIT IN FEDERAL COURT

As you know I am the Plaintiff in a federal lawsuit filed in Virginia by trial attorney Steven S. Biss. It may be that we will need to depose Ronald Galstad and others due to their actions in a civil conspiracy. I will need to discuss that with Attorney Biss. Ronald Galstad has committed acts in the private capacity and professional capacity with Galstad Jensen and McCann.

Below are articles I published that set forth the rudiments of the conspiracy.

See you tomorrow at 1:00 P.M. at the Polk County Justice Center in Crookston, Minnesota.

Respectfully,
Timothy Charles Holmseth

Transnational crime syndicate linked to police and public officials in Polk County Minnesota - BCA crime lab documents key evidence
By Timothy Charles Holmseth on July 17, 2018 at 1:12 P.M. CST
http://writeintoaction.com/Transnational%20Crime%20Syndicate.html

THAT MOMENT an Illuminati Prosecutor gets CAUGHT lying to a State judge to protect child pornographers
Making a Murderer in Minnesota - the Illuminati plot that failed
By Timothy Charles Holmseth on July 13, 2018 at 11:32 A.M. CST
http://writeintoaction.com/That%20moment%20when%20Galstad%20got%20caught.html

* * * * *

Attorney Handy met with Timothy Holmseth on July 19, 2018 at the Polk County Justice Center before the court hearing. She said she and her supervisor Kip Fontaine developed a motion for dismissal based upon 'jurisdiction'. She stated she was not obliged to act upon any of the other items Timothy Holmseth listed in his July 18 email.

This was the first time Attorney Handy said there was a defense for the charges although absolutely nothing had changed.

On July 24, 2018 Timothy Holmseth emailed Attorney Handy and Kip Fontaine the following:

* * * * *

Timothy Charles Holmseth
320 17th Street N.W.
Unit # 17
East Grand Forks, MN
56721
www.writeintoaction.com
tholmseth@wiktel.com
218.773.1299

In Re: MOTION TO DISMISS

July 24, 2018

Gretchen Handy
Handy Law Group PLLC
4050 Garden View Drive, Suite 100
Grand Forks, ND 58201

I appreciated sitting down with you for a few minutes on July 19 at the Polk County Justice Center before the court hearing.

I was pleased to learn that you and your supervisor, Kip Fontaine, have developed a Motion to Dismiss the charges against me - based upon jurisdiction.

However, we did not have opportunity to discuss the glaring Constitutional nightmare presented by the Broward County Order which the police used to arrest me.

I am going to present you a legal question using ‘all caps’ to give the question the emphasis I believe our country’s Constitution and citizen’s deserve.  

UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION - DOES A STATE COURT HAVE THE AUTHORITY, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES CONCEIEVABLE, TO ORDER A PERSON SHALL NEVER TALK ABOUT, OR EVEN MAKE AN “INDIRECT REFERENCE” ABOUT A SPECIFIC OTHER PERSON WHILE USING ANY FORM OF “ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION?”

1045. Definition—"Electronic Communication"
The definition of an "electronic communication" appears in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(12). This form of communication was added to Title III by the 1986 Act to cover most forms of electronic communications existing today. It includes any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photooptical system.

I attempted to imagine a time or situation; even under the most unusual of circumstances; where a county level court would have the authority to apply perimeters around a person’s right to speak of, or refer to, another specific person – a psychological blackout.

I look forward to seeing your argument to dismiss the charges against me based upon the fact the order violates my Constitutional rights and would end freedom of speech in the United States.

Respectfully,
Timothy Charles Holmseth

Cc: Kip Fontaine

* * * * *

On July 24, 2018 Timothy Holmseth published an article and emailed Attorney Handy a copy because she is mentioned in it.
* * * * *
Washington D.C. trial attorney that defeated Edward Snowden’s lawyer describes parallels to Florida court order against Minnesota journalist – says Shaquille O’Neal case proves journalist will win

By Timothy Charles Holmseth on July 24, 2018 at 10:34 A.M. CST

Can a county court issue a retraining order that forbids a person from ever talking ABOUT, another person; and forbid making even an “indirect reference” to a person; if using electronic communications?

Can a court essentially order – don’t think about it or you might talk about it – and if you talk about it with anybody you will go jail.

That’s what happened to Timothy Charles Holmseth, a Minnesota journalists who uncovered an international child sex trafficking operation and found himself accused of “stalking” in Broward County Family Court after he began to publish his work product.

The Broward order was then used as a springboard by police in Minnesota during a failed plot to frame Holmseth for kidnapping, rape, and murder - akin to the Steven Avery case.

Steven S. Biss, a trial attorney in the Washington D.C. area represents Holmseth in a multi-million dollar defamation lawsuit and says the Broward order violates Holmseth’s First Amendment rights.

Biss said he knows first-hand how false allegations of stalking are weaponized.

Biss tangled with, and defeated, high profile national security attorney Jesselyn Radack, the lawyer that represented Edward Snowden, after Radack tried the same tactic on him.

“I represent a guy named Trevor Fitzgibbon. Trevor Fitzgibbon is suing a lawyer in the District of Columbia who is a very famous whistleblower lawyer by the name of Jesselyn Radack,” Biss said.

The technique that she used is very similar to the one [used against you], Biss said.

Biss explained that he filed a lawsuit against Radack in the Eastern District of Virginia. “She then filed a Petition in D.C. alleging that the filing of the lawsuit; and my publication of the lawsuit on the federal database; the PACER database; constituted stalking and constituted revenge porn,” Biss said.  

Biss said Radack claimed ‘revenge porn’ because included within the body of the formal complaint were selfies Radack sent to his client, Fitzgibbon, in an effort to seduce him to have an affair. “They’re the kind of selfies you would send somebody if you wanted to have an affair with them,” Biss said.

“We won on all those issues,” Biss noted.

Biss said the accusation of stalking made against Holmseth for publishing information on the internet is the same tactic.

In 2011, a Broward County domestic violence court judge, Michael Kaplan, heard a case filed against Holmseth, a Minnesota resident that had conducted hours of consensual recorded interviews with a high profile media lawyer from Florida.

Holmseth received a telephone call warning he would be killed and thrown into a swamp if he attended the hearing in Fort Lauderdale.

In Holmseth’s absence, Kaplan granted the petitioner an Injunction For Protection Against Repeat Violence under a Florida dating law called ‘Repeat Violence’.

The Order forced Holmseth to remove legally obtained interviews regarding a missing child case that he published on his website. It further ordered Holmseth never talk about the Petitioner again using electronic communications.

As the Order reads on the Broward County Clerk’s website: Petition for injunction for protection against repeat (after notice)-the respondent shall not make any direct or indirect reference about the petitioner on the internet or by use of electronic communication. The respondent shall remove all books, writings, videos, photos, recording and/or materials currently published on the internet about the petitioner forthwith’

Holmseth only knew the Petitioner over the phone per a mutual journalist/source media relationship, which went bad after Holmseth learned about fake adoptions and child porn of a missing child, reported it to the Florida Attorney General, and met with the FBI that had been using Holmseth's information.

The Broward case had no foundation in reality.  

Holmseth was never criminally charged in either Minnesota or Florida with anything involving violence, stalking, assault, or anything else. The Order was simply granted out of thin air by Kaplan.

Biss said Florida had no jurisdiction to begin with. “Your publication of information on the internet from Minnesota could not possibly give rise to personal jurisdiction,” he said.

“The best case in the world is Shaq O’Neal case,” Biss said.

Biss explained that O’Neal was sued in Michigan for publishing unflattering pictures of a guy on his (Shaq’s) Instagram account. “Shaq said ‘look I’ve never been to Michigan’” Biss said, explaining that O’Neal prevailed.

Holmseth told Biss he has been discussing defenses with Gretchen Handy, Handy Law Group. Handy is Holmseth's public defender in a criminal case filed against him in Polk County, Minnesota alleging he violated the Broward order by publishing court files on the Web.

“Motion to Dismiss because its violates the First Amendment because your entitled – you have an absolute right as part of the freedom of speech and freedom of press to report on these matters of public interest,” Biss said.

Holmseth’s case is without a doubt a matter of public interest, which is supported by audio recordings Holmseth entered into evidence in Polk County that captures operatives discussing child pornography of a missing child from Florida named HaLeigh Cummings, fake adoptions, and international baby sales.  

Judge Tamara Yon referred to Holmseth’s submissions as “significant evidence” in an order favorable to Holmseth.

“The whole proceeding violates the First Amendment,” Biss said.

“I’m telling you Tim you need to get that issue before the court up there,” Biss said.

“I will make an appearance up there,” Biss said, noting he would file an appeal for Holmseth if need be.

Holmseth made contact with Attorney Handy today.

 

* * * * *

On July 26, 2018 Attorney Handy sent a reply email to Timothy Holmseth and said:

* * * * *

Timothy,

I will look into the constitutional argument. I will not, however, assist with the other issues.

Thank you.

Gretchen

* * * * *

SUMMARY/ANALYSIS

Attorney Handy's original position to Timothy Holmseth was the Florida court order could not be challenged. She then tried to cleverly extract a confession from Timothy Holmseth.

After significant pressure and the passing of a great deal of time, Attorney Handy stated she and Attorney Kip Fontaine had found a jurisdiction issue for dismissal. The jurisdiction issue had always existed but Attorney Handy did not acknowledge it until she conferred with Attorney Fontaine.  

After even yet, more pressure, Attorney Handy begrudgingly told Timothy Holmseth she would "look into" the constitutional argument. She made no assurance. Advice of other counsel, Steven S. Biss, who is representing me in a civil lawsuit, is the First Amendment violation is so glaring it's like staring at the sun in the sky.

Attorney Handy has not even come close to using "reasonable diligence" in her representation of Timothy Holmseth and steadfastly ignored obvious defenses until pressured. She has shown absolutely zero "zeal" regarding the obvious violations of Timothy Holmseth's constitutional rights.

  1. Violation of Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 8.3 - Reporting Professional Misconduct

Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct - Rule 8.3 - Reporting Professional Misconduct
(a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority.

Attorney Handy has not reported Attorney Ronald Galstad to the appropriate authority for his Misconduct regarding the perjury he committed on January 4, 2013 which he did while advancing the continued rights violations of her client Timothy Holmseth.

The Misconduct by Attorney Galstad in 2013 is relevant to the 2018 case because Attorney Galstad has found his feet stuck firmly in the cement of a conspiracy against Timothy Holmseth's rights and is subject to blackmail and extortion by his co-conspirators, of which there exists evidence.

Contained in the Discovery turned over by Attorney Galstad in the 2018 case is a police report from the arresting officer Benjamin Deckert that references Timothy Holmseth being arrested on November 21, 2011 for violating a restraining order. Officer Deckert said he spoke with REDACTED REDACTED on the phone. The 2011 case referenced by Officer Deckert in his report was in regards to REDACTED REDACTED and the same Florida court order that Timothy Holmseth was arrested for allegedly violating in 2011 and prosecuted by Attorney Galstad. 

The November 21, 2011 arrest of Timothy Holmseth was based upon an arrest warrant signed by Attorney Ronald Galstad alleging Timothy Holmseth violated the Broward Florida court order regarding REDACTED REDACTED. 

Attorney Handy is bound by Rule 1.3 Diligence to "pursue a matter on behalf of a client despite opposition, obstruction, or personal inconvenience to the lawyer, and take whatever lawful and ethical measures are required to vindicate a client's cause or endeavor".

Timothy Holmseth provided Attorney Handy INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE that showed Attorney Galstad advanced an ongoing conspiracy against Timothy Holmseth when he committed perjury on January 4, 2013 when he knowingly lied to District Judge Tamara Yon about the facts and circumstances surrounding the seizure of Timothy Holmseth's computer hard-drive when Galstad told Judge Yon the prosecution was working with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) regarding a second warrant and a tentative forensic search of Timothy Holmseth's hard-drive. Despite Attorney Galstad claiming there was communication regarding Timothy Holmseth, BCA Superintendent Drew Evans, as well as Jill Oliveira, public information officers, BCA, flatly stated they had NO KNOWLEDGE of anything about the case in East Grand Forks; did not authorize BCA evidence stickers to be placed on Timothy Holmseth's property; and were NEVER asked to perform a forensic search on Timothy Holmseth's hard-drive. 

After Attorney Galstad lied in court to Judge Yon on January 4, 2013, he (Galstad/Prosecution) kept Timothy Holmseth's hard-drive until April 26, 2013 and used it as leverage to coerce Timothy Holmseth into dropping the BAR complaint Timothy Holmseth had filed against Attorney Galstad. 

Sheriff's records with Polk County show EGFPD Sgt. Aeisso Schrage asked Polk County Sgt. Investigator Michael Norland to image (make a copy) of Timothy Holmseth's hard-drive.

Documents, facts, and circumstances show that if Timothy Holmseth had not agreed to drop his BAR complaint against Attorney Galstad, measures were being taken by conspirators to plant evidence on Timothy Holmseth's hard-drive.

On July 18, 2018 Timothy Holmseth emailed Attorney Handy the following:

* * * * *

Timothy Charles Holmseth
320 17th Street N.W.
Unit # 17
East Grand Forks, MN
56721
www.writeintoaction.com
tholmseth@wiktel.com
218.773.1299

In Re: Polk County Court Hearing on July 19, 2018 at 1:00 P.M.

July 18, 2018

Gretchen Handy
Handy Law Group PLLC
4050 Garden View Drive, Suite 100
Grand Forks, ND 58201

On January 4, 2013 Attorney Ronald Galstad committed perjury when he told Judge Yon that he and the Pine to Prairie Gang and Drug Task Force were communicating with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) to conduct a forensic examination of my computer hard -drive which was seized on December 14, 2012 using a warrant obtained by Sgt. Aeisso Schrage that was signed by Judge Remick. As you know, emails I received from Superintendant Drew Evans and Jill Oliveira at the BCA prove the BCA knew nothing about that huge raid on my home office where police seized all my digital property etc. and placed BCA evidence stickers on it.

Ronald Galstad lied to the Court because he was ACTIVELY and CONSCIOUSLY concealing the fact that the police and task force were looking for child rape pornography of five year-old HaLeigh Ann-Marie Cummings who vanished from her Florida home in 2009. The East Grand Forks Police, Ronald Galstad, and the Task Force had been told by members and associates of an Indiana group called Specialized Investigative Consultants Inc. that I possessed those pictures. They executed a plan to make me look like a drug dealer, as well as claiming they were searching for something pertaining to the Broward County Court Order, so they could convince a judge to sign the warrant. They believed they could simply pretend they 'stumbled upon' the photos of HaLeigh Cummings while leaving no written record of any kind regarding the source of their information which, was in fact, the actual child sex traffickers that kidnapped, sexually assaulted, and photographed the little girl.

Ronald Galstad committed perjury in the process of a conspiracy to frame me for kidnapping, rape, production of child porn, and murder of HaLeigh Cummings.

There is evidence that Ronald Galstad and other members of the police department, including Lt. Rodney Hajicek, conspired against me in an individual capacity that was separate and apart from their official duties.

TOMORROWS COURT HEARING

It sounds like there might be a continuance due to a different judge filling in.

My position is the lawyer that represents me SHALL confront the following:

- Violations of my constitutional rights regarding the fraudulently obtained Broward County Court Order
- Perjury by Attorney Ronald Galstad against me
- Criminal conspiracy to aid and abet bad actors committing kidnapping, trafficking, fake adoptions, and sex crimes against children

I also believe the lawyer that represents me should assist me in making contact with the FBI so I can give the FBI the evidence I obtained as a journalist regarding the child sex trafficking and baby sales operation. The Broward Court Order presently makes it a crime for me to even talk about the Petitioner (and victim in this case) with ANYONE through use of "electronic communications".  

CIVIL LAWSUIT IN FEDERAL COURT

As you know I am the Plaintiff in a federal lawsuit filed in Virginia by trial attorney Steven S. Biss. It may be that we will need to depose Ronald Galstad and others due to their actions in a civil conspiracy. I will need to discuss that with Attorney Biss. Ronald Galstad has committed acts in the private capacity and professional capacity with Galstad Jensen and McCann.

Below are articles I published that set forth the rudiments of the conspiracy.

See you tomorrow at 1:00 P.M. at the Polk County Justice Center in Crookston, Minnesota.

Respectfully,
Timothy Charles Holmseth

Transnational crime syndicate linked to police and public officials in Polk County Minnesota - BCA crime lab documents key evidence
By Timothy Charles Holmseth on July 17, 2018 at 1:12 P.M. CST
http://writeintoaction.com/Transnational%20Crime%20Syndicate.html

THAT MOMENT an Illuminati Prosecutor gets CAUGHT lying to a State judge to protect child pornographers
Making a Murderer in Minnesota - the Illuminati plot that failed
By Timothy Charles Holmseth on July 13, 2018 at 11:32 A.M. CST
http://writeintoaction.com/That%20moment%20when%20Galstad%20got%20caught.html

* * * * *

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know the Constitutional rights of her client, Timothy Holmseth, have been perpetually violated for nearly a decade by conspirators in violation of 18 U.S. Code 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know the criminal charges against her client, Timothy Holmseth, are the product of ongoing violations of 18 U.S. Code 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know the prosecutor against her client Timothy Holmseth, Ronald Galstad, is an involved conspirator against Timothy Holmseth, conspiring privately out of his law office Galstad Jensen & McCann

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know Attorney Ronald Galstad is engaging in malicious prosecution and Misconduct to avoid official investigation of his activities by the proper authorities

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know her client Timothy Holmseth is a target of conspirators  that seek to violate his rights because he possesses evidence obtained in the course of his journalism that reveals the identities of persons that possess child pornography of a missing child from Florida named HaLeigh Cummings 

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know her client Timothy Holmseth is a target of conspirators  that seek to violate his rights because he possesses evidence obtained in the course of his journalism that reveals the identities of persons that traffic infants and small children internationally 

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know her client Timothy Holmseth is a target of conspirators  that seek to violate his rights because he possesses evidence obtained in the course of his journalism that reveals the identities of persons that sex traffic infants and small children internationally - one of which is REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED, an attorney from Fort Lauderdale, Florida who is the alleged victim in the criminal case against Timothy Holmseth 

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know her client Timothy Holmseth is a target of conspirators  that seek to violate his rights because through malicious prosecution because court files and audio evidence showing and exposing the aforementioned child sex trafficking operation and testimonial accounts of child pornography appeared on the Web

Attorney Handy know this case - State of Minnesota v. Timothy Charles Holmseth - Court File Number 60-CR-18-343, 439, 441 - almost completely mirrors the exact same prosecution brought in 2011 against Timothy Holmseth - Minnesota Court File Number 60-CR-12-2640.

Attorney Handy knows both cases are alleged violations of Minnesota 609.748.6(b) harassment/restraining order. Both case were filed in the enforcement of Case Number 11-5919 - Final Judgment For Protection Against repeat Violence (After Notice) - Domestic Violence Division - in the 17th Judicial Circuit for Broward County, Florida.

Attorney Handy knows in both cases the East Grand Forks Police Department was the charging agency and Attorney Ronald Galstad was the prosecutor.

SUMMARY/ANALYSIS

Attorney Handy is fully aware of evidence that shows Attorney Ronald Galstad committed perjury on January 4, 2013 when he falsely claimed to Judge Tamara Yon the prosecution was  communicating with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) regarding the search warrant executed on Timothy Holmseth on December 14, 2012 whereby Timothy Holmseth's computer and property was seized and subsequently labeled with BCA evidence stickers.

Attorney Handy knows BCA Superintendent Drew Evans disavowed the EGFPD, Pine to Prairie Gang and Drug Task Force, and Attorney Ronald Galstad, in writing, when he stated the BCA had no knowledge of the matter; never authorized use of BCA evidence stickers on Timothy Holmseth's property; and was never asked to perform a forensic search of Timothy Holmseth's computer hard drive.  

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know Attorney Ronald Galstad held Timothy Holmseth's computer for four months after lying to Judge Yon. Attorney Handy knows Attorney Galstad's abuse of the judicial process thwarted an official investigation of Attorney Galstad that would have exonerated Timothy Holmseth and implicated Attorney Galstad and Attorney REDACTED REDACTED.

Attorney Handy knows and/or should know that Attorney Galstad is not fit to be prosecuting cases; is not honest and trustworthy; and Galstad definitely should not be prosecuting Timothy Holmseth.

Attorney Handy recklessly and unethically disregarded the rights of her own client in favor of protecting a fellow attorney that has been engaging in serious misconduct and illegal activity for years.

BACKGROUND/TIMELINE

THE 2011 CASE

Police database records show on November 21, 2011 Timothy Holmseth was arrested by EGFPD. The arrest warrant was signed by Lt. Rodney Hajicek and EGF City Attorney Ronald Galstad. Timothy Holmseth allegedly published a photograph of REDACTED REDACTED REDACTED in violation of the Florida court order.

The matter was resolved by plea on October 29, 2012 when Timothy Holmseth entered an Alford Plea.

On December 12, 2012 there was a scheduled compliance review hearing where the court heard a Motion, filed a few days before, by the prosecution, to have Timothy Holmseth adjudicated guilty on all counts claiming he did not remove all required content from the Web. The judge denied the prosecution's request to hold an evidentiary hearing because Discovery had not bee provided to Timothy Holmseth.

On December 14, 2012 the EGFPD and Pine to Prairie Gang and Drug Task Force executed a search warrant for Timothy Holmseth's computer and other items. The warrant stated it was in regards to Judge Yon's order dated October 29, 2012 - the warrant directed Timothy Holmseth's computer seized and approved the seizure of any narcotics found.

On January 4, 2013 Attorney Ronald Galstad told the court the prosecution was in communication with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) regarding a tentative forensic search of Timothy Holmseth's hard drive.

On April 26, 2013 Timothy Holmseth's property was returned after an agreement was reached that required Timothy Holmseth withdraw his BAR complaint against Ronald Galstad.  

THE 2018 CASE

On February 19, 2018 the East Grand Forks Police Department arrested Timothy Holmseth for allegedly publishing court records online that contained REDACTED REDACTED's name within them.

MAKING A MURDERER

Ronald Galstad and the East Grand Forks Police Department's Pre-Meditated Conspiratorial Association With The Underworld And Frame Up Artists

Creating A False Legend Of Timothy Holmseth Long Before The Planned Seizure Of His Computer

 

FRAME A JOURNALIST

Timothy Holmseth is a former award winning news reporter. In the spring of 2009 he began interviewing key figures in a national profile kidnapping of a five year girl from Florida named HaLeigh Cummings.

Timothy Holmseth learned during interviews, as well as from audios that were mailed to him, that child rape pornography had been created of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings.

Timothy Holmseth was told by Donald Knop, a legal assistant at the Law Office of REDACTED REDACTED, that REDACTED REDACTED possessed child pornography of HaLeigh Cummings. Donald Knop said he was given the photographs by REDACTED REDACTED and instructed to make copies onto a CD.

Conspirators working with the East Grand Forks Police and Attorney Ronald Galstad initiated a plan to frame Timothy Holmseth for kidnapping, rape, and murder shortly after he interviewed REDACTED REDACTED and then reported her to the FBI because he found out she was hiding the little girl and possessed illegal photos that were on a CD. 

CREATE A LEGEND THAT TIMOTHY HOLMSETH IS A PEDOPHILE

Beginning in 2009 there was a flurry of false child sex abuse allegations made against Timothy Holmseth to multiple agencies to create the appearance he was an armed, psychotic, dangerous pedophile, and pervert.

Tina Church, president, Specialized Investigative Consultants Inc, and Levi Page, both associates of Attorney REDACTED REDACTED, broadcast online that Timothy Holmseth had a "life-sized" poster of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings in his bedroom. This lie was told to create the appearance Timothy Holmseth used the five year old child's image to masturbate.

Many false and defamatory statements were made and published about Timothy Holmseth and his children.

Timothy Holmseth was investigated and completely cleared by Grand Forks Child Protective Services.

PLACE HALEIGH CUMMINGS WITH TIMOTHY HOLMSETH

On July 26, 2011 Tina Church telephoned the East Grand Forks Police Department and reported she had just got off the phone with Timothy Holmseth. She told the police Timothy Holmseth had just boasted to having the missing child HaLeigh Cummings in his apartment. EGFPD officers were dispatched to clear the call and a police report was generated.

Tina Church and Levi Page had telephoned Timothy Holmseth on a conference call shortly before making the false police report. The call was recorded by Timothy Holmseth and the recording proves Timothy Holmseth never said any such thing.

After there was a trail of documents and reports that made Timothy Holmseth look like a pedophile that bragged about having a missing child in his home, the police in East Grand Forks began to diabolically create a false paper trail that made Timothy Holmseth appear to be a drug dealer. This was being done so a search warrant could eventually be obtained for his computer. 

Following the false police report regarding the missing child, the false child sex abuse allegations, and the beginning of a paper trail intended to make Timothy Holmseth appear to be involved with drugs, REDACTED REDACTED petitioned the domestic violence court in Broward County, Florida for an Injunction For Protection Against Repeat Violence (Florida Dating/Relationship Law) despite Timothy Holmseth never being in Florida and never having met her.

Affidavits signed by REDACTED REDACTED that accompanied the Petition falsely stated Timothy Holmseth became enraged after being served court papers and abused his six year-old son - bruising him. 

The Florida court ordered Timothy Holmseth to remove everything he ever wrote or published about REDACTED REDACTED and further ordered Timothy Holmseth could never talk about, or even indirectly refer to, REDACTED REDACTED, using "electronic communications".

After the nefarious looking paper trail was complete, Timothy Holmseth was harassed by Levi Page and REDACTED REDACTED. Levi Page published on the Web that REDACTED REDACTED was the new "owner" of Timothy Holmseth's website www.writeintoaction.com. Timothy Holmseth then allegedly re-published the photo Levi Page had already published of REDACTED REDACTED.

On November 21, 2011 the EGFPD arrested Timothy Holmseth for violating the Florida court order.

On October 29, 2012 the criminal case against Timothy Holmseth was resolved through an Alford Plea.

But it wasn't quite that simple.

There was a plot underway to 'Make A Murderer'.

On October 29, 2012 Timothy Holmseth expected a trial by jury. However, his attorney, Public Defender Michael LaCoursiere, pressured and coerced Timothy Holmseth to take an Alford Plea. Only minutes before the scheduled trial, Attorney LaCoursiere told Timothy Holmseth the police had a plot to put Timothy Holmseth in St. Cloud State Prison and the Alford Plea was the safest thing to do.

Timothy Holmseth asked Attorney LaCoursiere if the State's witness, REDACTED REDACTED, was present to testify. LaCoursiere replied 'yes'. He was lying. REDACTED REDACTED wasn't in Minnesota.

Timothy Holmseth still insisted on a trial.

LaCoursiere then initiated a bizarre conversation with Timothy Holmseth's teenage daughter Marina Holmseth. LaCoursiere asked Marina Holmseth if she knew "Rachael Galstad" (Ronald Galstad's daughter). Marina replied yes they were in the same grade at the same high school. LaCoursiere then smiled and said he was Rachael Galstad's "god parent".

Timothy Holmseth asked Attorney LaCoursiere if he had ever gone to trial against his good friend Ronald Galstad. LaCoursiere said "no". Timothy Holmseth understood that LaCoursiere was forcing him to take the Alford Plea. Timothy Holmseth agreed to it because Timothy Holmseth knew LaCoursiere was going to throw the case if he didn't. 

The Alford Plea set forth conditions that the conviction would be removed from Timothy Holmseth's record after a year if there was no more offenses. However, it turned out there was yet, even, another, diabolical layer to the frame-up being created by Attorney Galstad, Attorney LaCoursiere, the EGFPD, and others.

The plan was to have Timothy Holmseth accept the Alford Plea and then have him 'adjudicated' guilty on a process crime a few weeks later.

Here's what the conspirators did in plain spoken words.

On October 29, 2012 Attorney Ronald Galstad colluded with (then) public defender Michael LaCoursiere to violate Timothy Holmseth's rights. Timothy Holmseth learned from LaCoursiere on October 29, 2102 that LaCoursiere was Ronald Galstad's daughter's God-father.

Attorney LaCoursiere coerced Timothy Holmseth into agreeing to an Alford Plea. When Timothy Holmseth resisted LaCoursiere told Holmseth the police wanted Holmseth in St. Cloud State Prison. When Timothy Holmseth continued to request a jury trial Attorney LaCoursiere told Timothy Holmseth and Marina Holmseth that he was Rachel Galstad's god-father. Timothy Holmseth succumbed to the thinly veiled threats and agreed to the Alford Plea.

During the hearing on October 29, 2012 where the Alford Plea was made, Attorney Galstad asked Judge Tamara Yon to keep the case open, and schedule a compliance review hearing, to assure Timothy Holmseth removed all applicable content from the Web.

Then, Attorney Ronald Galstad did something strange. He requested the Court keep Attorney LaCoursiere assigned to Timothy Holmseth's case until the compliance review was over (Galstad and LaCoursiere were working together and they needed LaCoursiere to remain Timothy Holmseth's lawyer to pull it off).

Minnesota Public Defender policy is that a Defendant's lawyer is dismissed from the case when the case is complete. The attorney does not stay on during 'probation' periods etc. Attorney Galstad 's request that Attorney LaCoursiere remain Timothy Holmseth's attorney, was, essentially, none of his business. Attorney Galstad's awkward interjection into Timothy Holmseth's business reveals both Galstad and LaCoursiere were in on it together.

The day before court hearing was to be held for the compliance review, Timothy Holmseth received a copy of a Motion in the U.S. Mail that had been filed to the Court by Attorney Galstad. The Motion requested the Court adjudicate Timothy Holmseth guilty, asserting there was still content on the Web that had not been removed.

However, any content that remained on the Web was buried so deep into cyberspace Timothy Holmseth did not see it when he diligently removed all the published content per the agreement. It was a cheap trick.

Timothy Holmseth contacted Attorney LaCoursiere by email about the court Motion he just received in the mail. Timothy Holmseth telegraphed to Attorney LaCoursiere he suspected something was amiss that may involve LaCoursiere.

At the courthouse on the day of the Compliance Review hearing, Timothy Holmseth told Attorney LaCoursiere that he printed the email he sent LaCoursiere the night before and brought it with. Timothy Holmseth warned LaCoursiere that if LaCoursiere did not properly defend him during the hearing Timothy Holmseth was going to stand up in court and show the judge the email.

Attorney Galstad asked for an Evidentiary Hearing to be held on the spot with no Discovery. LaCoursiere told the judge he needed some time because Timothy Holmseth has not been given Discovery.

Attorney Galstad became so angry he shouted and banged his fist on the table and said 'I'm ready to go right now! We have the evidence right here'.

Judge Yon refused to allow Attorney Galstad to hold an Evidentiary Hearing that day because the State had not provided Timothy Holmseth with Discovery. Not providing Discovery was part of the plan because if Timothy Holmseth knew the Web location of the content they were referring to he would have removed it before the court hearing.

A few days later...

On December 14, 2012 Timothy Holmseth was watching news about the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut at Sandy Hook Elementary School when his telephone rang. It was Attorney LaCoursiere calling to ask Timothy Holmseth questions about the case. Timothy Holmseth was already suspicious of Attorney LaCoursiere and activated a tape recorder and recorded the (strange) call.

Shortly (one minute) after Timothy Holmseth hung up with Attorney LaCoursiere there was a loud bang on Timothy Holmseth's door and a voice that said 'POLICE - OPEN UP - WE HAVE A WARRANT'.

The Pine to Prairie Gang and Drug Task Force Commander Sgt. Aeisso Schrage, accompanied by three East Grand Forks Police officers wearing bullet proof vests stormed Timothy Holmseth's home. They seized a great deal of property including Timothy Holmseth's computer, camera's, and storage discs.

Timothy Holmseth would later learn (figure out) the reason Attorney LaCoursiere called on the telephone was because LaCoursiere knew the four police officers were standing outside Timothy Holmseth's door. The plan was to have Timothy Holmseth talk about the criminal case out loud over the telephone so Sgt. Aeisso Schrage could fabricate an incriminating  statement for his police report (which he did) that appeared plausible because Timothy Holmseth had been talking to his attorney while the police listened.

However, Timothy Holmseth's recording of the telephone call proved the statement attributed to him in Sgt. Schrage's police report was 100% fake and was never made.

 

 

On January 4, 2013 there was a hearing attended by Attorney Galstad and Timothy Holmseth. At that court hearing Attorney Galstad said to Judge Yon. “I’ve just been notified that the BCA, before they’ll do a forensic search of that computer, wants either an Order of this court, or a search warrant that says they can - - we got the original search warrant, but for whatever reason the BCA wants something that says that they can actually search that hard-drive. So I am going to be either, one, asking - - or requesting an additional warrant for forensic search of that computer hard-drive or the Court can make that Order as they see fit, but I’m going to be doing that,” court transcripts show.

The Public Defenders Office then assigned Attorney Bruce Ringstrom to Timothy Holmseth's case (because Timothy Holmseth asked LaCoursiere be removed).

Months went by.

In April, 2013 Attorney Ringstrom told Timothy Holmseth he had reached an agreement with Attorney Galstad to withdraw the Motion to have Timothy Holmseth adjudicated guilty on the condition Timothy Holmseth withdraw his BAR Complaint against Attorney Galstad and remove all negative articles Timothy Holmseth had published about local officials in Polk County.

Because the police possessed Timothy Holmseth's hard-drive which held every aspect of his life from photos and life moments with his children, to investigative journalism recordings and work product regarding pornography of a missing child named HaLeigh Cummings, an international child sex trafficking operation and fake adoption scheme, Timothy Holmseth agreed to the terms set forth by Attorney Ringstrom and Attorney Galstad.

On April 26, 2013 Timothy Holmseth's computer was returned  by Sgt. Aeisso Schrage. Much of the seized property was covered with evidence stickers that said BCA.

 

When Timothy Holmseth attempted to turn the computer on it would not boot. Timothy Holmseth looked inside and found plugs had been unattached and plastic clips were snapped. He reassembled things and managed to get the hard-drive to boot. It ran sluggish and slow. It appeared to have been installed with a virus. He managed to open the computer's activity log and screen-shot it. The activity log revealed the computer had been turned on December 28, 2102 (14 days after it had been seized).

Timothy Holmseth's computer was turned on December 28, 2012. That means someone searched the hard-drive and did not find the photos of HaLeigh Cummings they believed would be there.

That means the only way Attorney Ronald Galstad could justify keeping Timothy Holmseth's hard-drive was to tell Judge Yon in court on January 4, 2013 that they were working with the BCA to do a forensic search.

The seizure of Timothy Holmseth's computer was quickly reported upon by a website called www.radionewz.net, whose general counsel attorney was/is REDACTED REDACTED; the same attorney that fraudulently obtained a domestic violence court order in Broward County to force remove legally published content from Timothy Holmseth; an order used to silence, threaten, and imprison Timothy Charles Holmseth.

TIMOTHY HOLMSETH DISCOVERED ATTORNEY GALSTAD COMMITTED PERJURY

On November 20, 2013 Timothy Holmseth requested EGF Police Chief Michael Hedlund provide him with 'Chain of Evidence' records for the property seized by his Department. Chief Hedlund finally responded on December 6, 2013. Hedlund advised Timothy Holmseth no chain of evidence records existed.

Timothy Holmseth contacted the BCA on December 9, 2013 and the BCA completely disavowed the police and Attorney Galstad.

Timothy Holmseth communicated by email with Superintendant Drew Evans and Jill Oliveira, the public information officer.  "The BCA had no role in the investigation you describe and did not attach any tags to evidence in that case," Oliveira said. "We were not requested to conduct a forensic examination of your computer," Evans said.

 

Timothy Holmseth requested and received a Polk County Sheriff's Report authored by Sgt. Investigator Michael Norland that revealed Sgt. Norland performed a forensic search on Timothy Holmseth's computer. Sgt. Norland said, "I looked through the computer and did not find anything that would show illegal activity on the computer". 

Sgt. Norland's date of activity with hard-drive are April 3, 2013 does NOT appear in the computers activity log. The computer logs shows it was activated on April 26, 2013 which is not a day law enforcement admits to turning it on.

Sgt. Aeisso Schrage asked Sgt. Norland to make a copy of the hard-drive.

In 2017 Timothy Holmseth recovered the investigation files regarding child sex trafficking and pornography that were marooned on his hard-drive after he located back-ups. Timothy Holmseth submitted the files in support of a Motion to Vacate in Polk County.

Judge Yon Granted his Motion and referred to the files as "significant evidence".

 

 

 

On February 19, 2018 the EGFPD arrested Timothy Holmseth alleging he published court records that contained the name REDACTED REDACTED.

 

TIMOTHY HOLMSETH'S RIGHT TO COMPETENT COUNSEL

Timothy Holmseth's computer, which was seized on December 14, 2012 - the day of the Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, by the EGFPD and Minnesota Pine to Prairie Gang and Drug Task Force, contained information regarding but not limited to:

I am requesting new counsel.

I respectfully ask that any counsel assigned to my case not be a member of any closed group, secret society, fraternity, or club that has secret oaths and oaths of secrecy.

Respectfully,
Timothy Charles Holmseth

Cc: Gretchen Handy, Kristine Kolar

Go Back