Minnesota prosecutors asked to 'Meet and Confer' regarding Federal Injunction - author being intimidated by Florida law enforcement after uncovering Washington D.C. based baby sales operation  

by Timothy Charles Holmseth on November 25, 2017, 8:04 A.M. CST

Greg Widseth
Ronald Galstad

From:
Timothy Charles Holmseth                                                                 
320 17th Street N.W.
Unit# 17
East Grand Forks, MN
56721                                                                                 
218.773.1299
218.230.1597 (cell)
timothy.holmseth@writeintoaction.com
tholmseth@wiktel.com
www.writeintoaction.com
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=10000918715473

In Re: Request to Meet and Confer

November 24, 2017

To:
Greg Widseth
Polk County Attorney
Polk County Justice Center
816 Marin Avenue
Suite No. 254
Crookston, MN 56716-2148

Ronald Galstad
City Attorney
City of East Grand Forks, MN
56721

Attorneys Widseth and Galstad,

I am requesting a Meet and Confer conference pertaining to the State of Minnesota and/or City of East Grand Forks as it relates to legal action being taken against me by the State of Florida.

I am contacting you pursuant to 9th Minnesota District Family Court – Case Number 60-FA-13-468 and Holmseth v. City of East Grand Forks et al - 0:14-cv-02970

I am contacting you pursuant to Rule 65: Injunctions and Restraining Orders - Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

I plan to request the United States District Court grant me Injunctive Relief and/or other remedies regarding what I assert is operatives within the State of Minnesota that are in criminal collusion with operatives in the State of Florida to violate my rights and have me illegally arrested.

I would like to discuss with you whether or not the State of Minnesota plans to enforce any legal action brought against me out of the State of Florida.

I am requesting the State of Minnesota provide me, in writing, a formal declaration that the State of Minnesota will NOT recognize or enforce any more criminal allegations made against me in Florida regarding my speech, journalism, publishing, authoring, websites, or electronic communications.

I am requesting the aforementioned because I have evidence of a criminal conspiracy against me.

SUMMARY OF CONSPIRACY

Since 2009 the following has been visited upon me by bad actors demanding I remove my websites (in their entirety) from the Web.

  1. Threats to kidnap my grandchild
  2. Threats to my daughter
  3. Threats to kill me
  4. Threats to rape me  
  5. Attempts to have me fired from my job
  6. Threats to have me evicted
  7. Attempts (by Tina Church) to blackmail/extort City of East Grand Forks Attorney Ronald Galstad and Polk County Attorney Greg Widseth to involuntarily commit me into a mental institute
  8. Attempts to make me lose custody rights of my child
  9. Defame me as being a ‘pedophile’
  10. Break into my car (to plant narcotics)
  11. Slash my car tire
  12. Run my car off the road
  13. Accuse me of wire fraud
  14. Defame my professional background and history of awards

On November 22, 2017 Wordpress provided me a copy of a Subpoena they received from the Broward County, Florida Clerk of Court signed by Assistant States Attorney Michael J. Satz, regarding a criminal investigation being conducted by Detective Andrew Gianino, Lighthouse Point, Florida police department. The subpoena demanded account information from one of my websites.

In May of 2009 ***** *****, a civil divorce attorney from Florida that was representing the mother of a missing child named HaLeigh Cummings telephoned me at my residence in Polk County. She wanted to talk to me, in my capacity as a journalist and publisher, about the missing child HaLeigh Cummings (and try to find out what her associates and law office employees, who had also been calling me; were telling me).

In June of 2009 I contacted the Florida Attorney General and FBI regarding information I obtained about the missing child. The information implicated ***** ***** and many of her colleagues in serious crimes. I eventually obtained information regarding child pornography of HaLeigh Cummings and an illegal international adoption/ baby sales operation being run by ***** and ***** ***** with a man named John Regan who told multiple witnesses he was “FBI” and “CIA”.

On June 2, 2009, ***** ***** telephoned the East Grand Forks Police and complained about me but was told by Lt. Rodney Hajicek her concerns were civil in nature.

***** ***** and/or her PI, William Staubs, and/or her media consultant, Art Harris, and/or PI Tina Church, subsequently contacted my child’s mother Rhonda W. Callahan and began initiating conversations regarding the custody status of my son ***** Holmseth, and interfering with our stabile lives by suggesting to her I was a dangerous pedophile that was abusing my son.

Unbeknownst to me (until years later), on July 10, 2009, Art Harris and Lt. Hajicek were privately/secretly communicating via email regarding me. Hajicek was using Rod.hajicek@gmail.co  and discussing the fact I was assisting the FBI and the FBI was receiving email evidence regarding photos of HaLeigh Cummings from me that I obtained from sources. Harris told Hajicek “He’s got to be stopped”.

The emails and an accompanying 22-page FBI report I authored, which implicated ***** *****, Art Harris, William Staubs, John Regan, Jeremiah Regan, and others was never turned over to me during many different records request I made to the EGFPD. I assert the reason for that is because the emails were created on Rodney Hajicek’s private email and not subject to data records requests.

Rodney Hajicek stated in the June 2, 2009 police report that he printed out the emails and gave them to the Polk County Attorney. The emails were clearly private (Rod.hajicek@gmail.com) so Polk County Attorney Greg Widseth would have known Rodney Hajicek was acting in an individual capacity against me (Timothy Charles Holmseth).

Neither Rodney Hajicek nor Greg Widseth are known to have contacted the FBI regarding this matter.

In 2011, ***** ***** obtained an Order for Protection Against Repeat Violence (Florida domestic violence law) from the Broward County Court. It was served on me by the Polk County Sheriff.

I will argue to the federal court that if I had possessed the emails and 22-page FBI report that was hidden from me by the EGFPD, the Broward County court order would/could/should not have been granted.

I am providing you work product of a supporting affidavit I am submitting to the Minnesota District Court in advance of the hearing scheduled for December 13, 2017 at 9 A.M. at the Polk County Justice Center.

WORK PRODUCT

Perhaps no First Amendment right is more secure than the news media’s right to publish information free from government censorship. While public officials frequently wish they could prevent newspapers, magazines and broadcast stations from publishing sensitive or embarrassing information, their ability to censor the media is extremely limited. These limits on prior restraint (as such censorship is also known) have been firmly in place for more than 70 years.

In 1931, the U.S. Supreme Court heard an appeal brought by the publisher of a small Minneapolis newspaper that had published several articles alleging that law enforcement officials were turning a blind eye toward local organized crime. The county attorney sought to prohibit further publication of the newspaper, citing a state statute that outlawed “malicious, scandalous and defamatory” periodicals. In Near v. State of Minnesota, the Court held that the statute constituted an unlawful prior restraint. Under the First Amendment, the Court said, publication of information, no matter how scandalous, can be prevented only in “exceptional cases,” such as to protect the recruiting or transporting of troops in a time of war or to prevent the distribution of obscenity.

INTRODUCTION
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT PRIOR RESTRAINT

  1. This Affidavit is filed in conjunction and support of my original MOTION TO VACATE and supporting AFFIDAVIT, which I filed pursuant to Minnesota Rule 60: Relief from Judgment or Order, 60.02 Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence, Fraud; etc.
  1. Between 2011 and 2013 the State of Minnesota / District Court(s) heard arguments and issued orders focusing on subject matter I was covering as a reporter, journalist, author, and publisher regarding a missing child from Florida named HaLeigh Cummings.
  1. I have asserted evidence shows agencies under the Seal of the State of Minnesota conspired with third parties to illegally achieve Prior Restraint against my publication, by leveraging my profession as a reporter, journalist, author, and publisher against my parenting rights.
  1. The State of Minnesota took an ongoing interest in my reporting, journalism, and publishing regarding the federal investigation into the kidnapping of HaLeigh Cummings.
  1. Through the combined efforts of The State of Minnesota Guardian ad Litem program, Pine to Prairie Gang and Drug Task Force, East Grand Forks Police Department, Polk County Sheriff’s Office, Polk County Attorney, and City of East Grand Forks, my publication became the target of a censorship and Prior Restraint campaign pertaining to my journalism, speech, and publishing that was enforced by both the Minnesota 9th District Family Court and Criminal Court.
  1. Between 2009 and 2013, a non-Party named ***** *****, who is an attorney from Florida, and who was the attorney for ***** of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings, and who I interviewed extensively regarding the kidnapping case, was directly involved and in contact with my accusers including with:
  1. The extensive court files shows I steadfastly argued to the Court that improper collusion between ***** ***** and her agents, with my accusers, was underway to violate my Constitutional rights and silence my reporting and publishing.
  1. The Court openly acknowledged my assertions regarding the improper involvement of ***** ***** and third parties, during a child support hearing wherein I requested a protective seal around my financial documents, which RESPONDENT was asking I give her. The Court stated from the bench that ‘people that should not have been involved with your family became involved with your family’. The Court granted my request for a Protective Seal because information was being leaked to ***** ***** and/or her operatives.
  1. I am hereby submitting audio recordings obtained by my publication during the course of my journalistic investigation into the Florida child victim cases of HaLeigh Ann-Marie Cummings and Caylee Marie Anthony. 
  1. The audio I am submitting demonstrates ***** ***** has a very long and documented history of using her law license to meddle in the affairs of persons that are not her client for the purpose of changing custody and/or parenting time rights of their children using co-conspirators in law enforcement, social services, CIA, FBI, etc.
  1. The following is an excerpt from Polk Audio 1.

Wayanne Kruger: They were funding fake adoptions.

Timothy Holmseth: ***** ***** was?

Wayanne Kruger: Yeah. I mean she’s actually – she’s not a divorce lawyer – she’s a, she’s a baby seller – she’s a broker – she’s selling babies and kids to couples and she doesn’t care who they are – just give me your money.
  1. The audio recordings were acquired by me, and in my possession, during the time the State of Minnesota targeted my publication for Prior Restraint through the District Family Court using my son, ***** Holmseth.

NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE / EGFPD / PINE TO PRAIRIE TASK FORCE / SEIZURE OF MY AUDIO

  1. The aforementioned audio is Newly Discovered Evidence that was recovered by me long after the East Grand Forks Police Department and Minnesota Pine to Prairie Gang and Drug Task Force seized my computer and storage discs per a Search Warrant signed by Judge Remick on December 13, 2012.
  1. The Warrant states in part, “Books, ledgers, journals, notes and/or other records which pertain to the violation of the Amended Order for injunction for protection against repeat violence dated September 19, 2011 and the Sentencing Order of the Judge Yon dated October 29, 2012 in court file number 60-CR-12-2640 including those contained on a computer hard-drive, a storage disc, or other electronic media”.
  1. The aforementioned referenced injunction for protection against repeat violencepertains to an Order issued in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and For Broward County, Florida – Case Number DVCE – 115919 – ***** L. *****/Petitioner v. Timothy C. Holmseth/Respondent.
  1. The Broward County Court issued the following Order: THE RESPONDENT SHALL NOT MAKE ANY DIRECT OR INDIRECT REFERENCE ABOUT THE PETITIONER ON THE INTERNET OR BY USE OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION. THE RESPONDENT SHALL REMOVE ALL BOOKS, WRITINGS, VIDEOS, PHOTOS, RECORDINGS, AND/OR MATERIALS CURRENTLY PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET ABOUT THE PETITIONER FORTWITH.
  1. The audio is ‘newly discovered’ because the EGFPD returned my computer, where the files were stored on the hard-drive, inoperable. I possessed back-ups that could not be accessed without a similar computer tower. I eventually obtained an old computer tower given to me by my parents. I then was required to listen to hours and hours and hours of audio because the back-ups did not have the cataloging system I had created for my primaries.

MINNESOTA COURT ORDERED TIMOTHY CHARLES HOLMSETH TO NOT SPEAK SPECIFIC NAMES INCLUDING HALEIGH CUMMINGS, ***** *****, or WILLIAM MURTAUGH

  1. In my original MOTION TO VACATE, I requested the Court vacate specific Orders from:
  1. The Introductory statement of my MOTION TO VACATE reads as follows: PETITIONER brings this MOTION TO VACATE because NEW EVIDENCE that was not available at the time of trial shows adverse parties within Minnesota law enforcement and the larger interstate judicial community, criminally and civilly conspired with agents of a private corporation that received support from the U.S. Military to strategically create life-threatening conflict in the life of Parties’ minor child ***** Holmseth; conflict that would be used to justify court actions against Plaintiff’s constitutional rights for the illegal purpose of protecting a criminal enterprise of child sex trafficking and child pornography.

TIMOTHY CHARLES HOLMSETH POSSESSED JOURNALISTICALLY AQUIRED INFORMATION REGARDING INTERNATIONAL BLACK MARKET BABY SALES AND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

  1. PETIONER possesses, and has herein submitted to the Court, journalistic work product that the Broward Court ordered not be published by PETITIONER, which contains information that Attorney ***** L. ***** is a professional criminal, kidnapper, child sex trafficker, cyber criminal, and extortionist whose expertise is using her law license, and/or connections acquired thereby, to illegally change the custody and/or take unlawful possession of a child through illegal means for purposes of financial enrichment, child pornography, witness intimidation, and/or sex trafficking. 
  1. PETITIONER is submitting to the court journalistic work product including:

AUDIO

  1. ***** ***** and her husband, ***** *****, have a history of illegally acquiring infants and children and selling them on the international black market with the assistance of a fake pastor named John Regan who identities himself as “CIA” and “FBI”
  1. ***** ***** possessed child pornography of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings
  1. ***** ***** used her status as a licensed attorney to trick Kristina Renee Prevatt, a young mother that was a law enforcement witness in the HaLeigh Cummings kidnapping investigation, (who was first drugged with a mixture of cocaine and heroin) to sign a document wherein she unknowingly surrendered custody of her child over to a drug dealer
  1. Wayanne Kruger conveys information regarding ***** ***** working as a volunteer in Florida social services doing home-studies and obtaining children to sell via fake adoptions for the international black market using medical documents and church dossiers.
  1. Wayanne Kruger explains what ***** ***** associate (pastor) John Regan told her about him being a CIA and FBI agent that once reported directly to Washington and a child prostitution ring in Putnam County, Florida.
  1. Wayanne Kruger says Kristina Prevatt was tricked into signing custody documents after being given a combination of cocaine and heroin.
  1. Wayanne Kruger says ***** ***** goes crazy if anybody confronts or talks about John Regan. 
  1. ***** ***** and her private investigator, bail bondsman William E. Staubs, Case Closed, Inc. claimed to have found the remains of slain toddler Caylee Marie Anthony at a time prior to the child’s remains being found by meter reader (former bail bondsman) Roy Kronk. Kronk testified he discovered the child’s remains and that was the accepted official version.
  1. ***** ***** and her private investigator, bail bondsman William E. Staubs, Case Closed, Inc. illegally intercepted a telephonic communication from a motel room in Florida, with a Florida resident, in violation of Florida Statute § 934.03(4) which makes the offense a felony
  1. ***** ***** spoke to me about her client Crystal Sheffield (the mother of HaLeigh Cummings). ***** ***** told me that “the initial day [Crystal Sheffield’s] daughter went missing [Victim’s Advocate Wayanne Kruger] gave [Crystal Sheffield] one of her own pills to help soothe her anxiety”. This revelation BLOWS the COVER of the conspirators that tried to hide the connection between the kidnapping of HaLeigh Cummings and the murder of Caylee Anthony.
  1. ***** ***** spoke to me about her involvement with Kristina Renee Prevatt. ***** ***** said she was working with the police. She describes pressuring Prevatt to go into rehab. She explains how she asked Prevatt to go to a treatment center with her and do a walk-through. She describes warning Prevatt she will keep getting arrested if she doesn’t tell the police something. ***** ***** was NOT Prevatt’s lawyer.
  1. ***** ***** told me she assisted Donnie Spells who is the father of Kristina Prevatt’s baby. ***** ***** was working with BOTH Donnie Spells and Kristina Prevatt regarding their child although she was not the lawyer of either.

ATTORNEY ***** L. ***** – DOCUMENTED PROOF OF CUSTODY INTERFERENCE

Audio and other evidence I possess as journalistic work-product comprised of audio interviews, documents, and data pertain to allegations that:

This Meet and Confer request is being submitted via email addresses I have on file. This document will also be placed in the U.S. Mail.

Respectfully submitted,
Timothy Charles Holmseth
Pro Se
Minnesota 9th District
U.S. Court – District of Minnesota 

Attached: July 10, 2009 email – Hajicek/Harris, Broward County Subpoena

 

Go Back