Transnational child sex trafficking will be addressed in Minnesota court case

By Timothy Charles Holmseth on July 26, 2018 at 11:53 A.M. CST

Evidence regarding transnational child sex trafficking, and an attempt by Attorney Ronald Galstad, a Minnesota prosecutor, to cover it up, will be addressed in the 9th Minnesota District Court.

Timothy Charles Holmseth, a former news reporter and journalist from East Grand Forks alleges Galstad, and several others conspired to violate his constitutional rights in their bid to protect operatives that are trafficking in children through kidnappings and fake adoptions and creating child pornography.

Holmseth advised his public defender, Gretchen Handy, as well as Attorney Kip Fontaine, that Handy will either address the rights violations, and evidence of crimes against children, or Holmseth will stand up in open court and do it himself.

Holmseth asserts public officials are trying to avoid prosecution for matters regarding the Presidential Executive Order signed by President Trump that declared matters of transnational trafficking a matter of National Security.

From: Timothy Charles Holmseth [] 
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:10 AM
To: 'Handy, Gretchen'
Cc: 'Fontaine, Kip O.'
Subject: Attn: Attorney Gretchen Handy / Presidential Executive Order / Transnational Criminal Organizations 
Timothy Charles Holmseth
320 17th Street N.W.
Unit # 17
East Grand Forks, MN


July 26, 2018

Gretchen Handy
Handy Law Group PLLC
4050 Garden View Drive, Suite 100
Grand Forks, ND 58201


I am in receipt of your letter dated July 24, 2018 advising me of the pre-trial hearing scheduled for August 9 at 1:00 P.M. at the Polk County Justice Center in Crookston.

During our brief meeting before court on July 19 at the Polk County Justice Center, you addressed the letter I sent you on July 18. You said you discussed it with your supervisor REDACTED Fontaine.

In my letter I said in part:

My position is the lawyer that represents me SHALL confront the following:

- Violations of my constitutional rights regarding the fraudulently obtained Broward County Court Order
- Perjury by Attorney Ronald Galstad against me
- Criminal conspiracy to aid and abet bad actors committing kidnapping, trafficking, fake adoptions, and sex crimes against children

You advised me that you and Attorney Fontaine had developed a basis for dismissal based upon "jurisdiction". You said the other things I mentioned in my letter were not within the purview of your representation of me.

I disagree with your understanding of what you believe your requirements are as my defense counsel. I know all lawyers are required to assure their client's Constitutional rights are protected.

I have spoken with Attorney Steven S. Biss who is represents me in a federal lawsuit filed in Virginia.

The respondent shall not make any direct or indirect reference about the petitioner on the internet or by use of electronic communication. The respondent shall remove all books, writings, videos, photos, recording and/or materials currently published on the internet about the petitioner forthwith
     - Broward County Court Order, 2011

Attorney Biss told me the Broward County court order violates the First Amendment. He said the Order is so broad it would prohibit me from talking to him. You actually confirmed that, but stated it didn't matter because the communications between you and I are protected.

Actually, because REDACTED REDACTED has used this Broward County court order issued against me, in many other of her personal filings, pleadings, and court cases unrelated to me, such as her own Bankruptcy Court and civil lawsuits filed against her, I have had opportunity to hear the legal opinion of several Florida lawyers handling those cases who all said this Broward County court order is 'off-the charts' unconstitutional.  

“The whole proceeding violates the First Amendment,” Attorney Biss said.

The Broward County court order forbids me from communicating with anybody regarding REDACTED REDACTED wherein it says I shall not make any direct or indirect reference about the petitioner by "use of electronic communication".

The language of the Broward County court order violates my First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal & independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness.
     - United States Declaration of Independence / 1776  

Not only has the language of this court order forbid communications with my lawyer, pastor, family; it has placed me in permanent danger and deprived me of unalienable rights that our Founding Fathers declared as coming from our creator, that being "the preservation of life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness"

The conspirators involved in targeting me illegally exploit the Broward County court order and use it in diabolical efforts to cause me to accidently violate it.

Here is one example.

Tina Church, Specialized Investigative Consultants Inc., Mishawaka, Indiana is an associate of REDACTED REDACTED. Church telephones me on a semi-regular basis and makes direct references to "REDACTED REDACTED". Church's objective is to solicit a response from me that could be construed as a "direct or indirect reference" to REDACTED REDACTED.

If I accidently make the slightest utterance that could be called a reference to REDACTED REDACTED there will be a police report made against me to law enforcement in either Minnesota, Florida, or both.

Further - because of the overly broad nature of the Order it could be used to diabolically and improperly accuse me of hundreds if not thousands of criminal violations based upon what I might have been 'thinking' when I said 'something'.

Our country's founders and lawmakers, through great wisdom and intelligence, anticipated evil people when developing our Constitutional rights.

If you cannot; will not; or are not capable of making a legal argument based upon the First Amendment please let me know. I have been advised by Attorney Biss that I must make sure the argument is made so it is preserved for appeal. He states he will make an appearance in Minnesota and handle the appeal.

Finally - based upon documents, facts, and court records pertaining directly to this case regarding kidnapping, child pornography, fake adoptions, and international child sex trafficking, I hereby believe there is evidence to show there are illegal efforts in place through back channels and quiet conspiracy for public officials to avoid consequences and prosecution for violations of federal laws in place as they pertain to the Presidential Executive Order on 'Enforcing Federal Law with Respect to Transnational Criminal Organizations and Preventing International Trafficking' signed by President Donald J. Trump and issued on February 9, 2017. I hereby request, and insist that a legal argument be made for Motion To Dismiss based upon the Presidential Executive Order. 

I have the names.

Please let me know how you wish to proceed.

Timothy Charles Holmseth

Cc: Kip Fontaine

"...let the whole world know that today is a day of reckoning..."
     - M. McBride / Independence Day

Go Back